Pathik Basu advocates for an “Planet/Earth-Centric Living” philosophy as a crucial response to both contemporary ecological and social crises, emphasizing a shift away from money-centric existence towards interdependence with nature and community. Based on his practical experience farming in small, decentralized units (even as small as 250 sq ft), Basu proposes a living framework where families can achieve self-sufficiency in food, nutrition, and health—producing daily vegetables, fruit, fish, and eggs organically—by treating “one’s waste as another’s nutrition.” This practical application is paired with a social call to action he terms “Tree, Bird, Fifteen,” urging individuals to nurture the environment in their immediate surroundings and strengthen bonds of trust and support with their 10-15 closest kins, thereby cultivating a network of love and mutual aid that forms the foundation of a prosperous, non-violent, and aesthetically grounded society.
From Cough Syrup to Contested Survival: Piramal Pharma’s Phensedyl and OTC Citizenship
This not-an-essay traces the cultural, political, and pharmaco-poetic life of Phensedyl—manufactured by Piramal Pharma—and situates the codeine-laced syrup within a broader history of scarcity, surveillance, and self-medication in South Asia. Moving between memoir, literary analysis, public-health framing, and theoretical lenses drawn from Foucault, Derrida, and contemporary critiques of cannibal capitalism, the piece investigates how a seemingly mundane cough syrup becomes a portal into the infrastructures of regulation, desire, and dispossession. It examines how Phensedyl served, for many in the 1980s–90s, as a substitute for alcohol in restricted environments, how codeine’s codification reflects state power over pain, and how bodies transformed into sites of both rebellion and compliance. Through lyric passages, sociological insight, and critical reflection on toxicity, addiction, and governance, the article argues that Phensedyl becomes more than a pharmaceutical artifact—it becomes a mirror through which we read the politics of breath, the bureaucratization of relief, and the evolving pharmacological citizenship of late-modern South Asia.
The Weaponization of Intimacy: How “Love Jihad” Became Hindutva’s Battle Cry
This article critically examines the socio-political, legal, and cultural dimensions of the “Love Jihad” narrative in contemporary India, tracing its roots in colonial fear-mongering, patriarchal control, and Hindutva ideology. It highlights how Muslim men are cast as predatory and Hindu women as endangered, while Muslim women and Hindu men are systematically erased, reflecting a deeply gendered and majoritarian logic. The narrative has been instrumentalized politically and legally—through anti-conversion laws, surveillance, and policing—transforming private interfaith or inter-religious love into a public, criminalized, and highly regulated act. Documented cases reveal lethal consequences, social ostracism, and impunity, illustrating the human cost of communalized suspicion. The article situates these dynamics in cinema, showing how films from Bombay to Kedarnath and PK reflect, challenge, or subvert stereotypes, with narratives ranging from tragic social constraints to satirical critiques of prejudice. Interweaving environmental catastrophe, labour hierarchies, and ideological indoctrination, the study underscores how intimacy, autonomy, and desire are policed by intersecting forces of religion, gender, and state power, emphasizing that “Love Jihad” is less a phenomenon of romance than a tool of surveillance, communal control, and patriarchal-nationalist assertion.
The Big Picture of a Philanthropic Façade: Inside the Piramal Empire
This article offers a critical exploration of the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and philanthropic landscape surrounding the Piramal Group, with particular emphasis on the Piramal Foundation and its mastermind tycoon Ajay Piramal. It highlights the stark contradictions between publicly espoused moral principles and documented corporate controversies. While Piramal frames his business philosophy through the lenses of Gandhian trusteeship, Tagorean humanitarianism, and Vaishnava spiritual teachings—collectively termed by Mr. Piramal as so-called “conscious capitalism”—a series of regulatory incidents, allegations of political ties, environmental transgressions, restructuring tactics, and financial scandals underscore a dissonance between professed ideals and actual practices. The analysis contends that the Group’s philanthropic initiatives often serve not as sincere contributions to societal welfare but rather as moral facades that mitigate reputational damage, alleviate tax burdens, and transform legal mandates into narratives of benevolence. Examples such as CSR responses to historical environmental harm, privileged private healthcare options juxtaposed with public health efforts, and educational institutions seemingly designed to cater to the promoter class illustrate philanthropy being wielded as a tool for image rehabilitation and structural self-legitimization. Through this case study, the article reveals a larger systemic dynamic wherein corporate power deploys the rhetoric of service, charity, and ethical oversight to obscure or deflect scrutiny, raising profound inquiries about the political economy of philanthrocapitalism in contemporary India.
Himalayan Saints and the Defence of Sacred Ecology: Resisting Developmental Hindutva Across the Char Dham Corridor
The Char Dham conflict in Uttarakhand exposes a deep contradiction within contemporary Hindutva: a BJP-led “developmental Hinduism” that fuses neoliberal infrastructure, militarized nationalism, and centralized temple governance is destroying the sacred-ecological fabric it claims to protect. The 2016 Char Dham all-weather highway and the 2019 (later repealed) Devasthanam Management Act have sought to convert the fragile, divine Himalayan shrines of Yamunotri, Gangotri, Kedarnath, and Badrinath into a securitized tourism-military corridor. In response, hereditary priests, ascetics, and local communities have mobilised a powerful resistance, framing the mountains and rivers as the living body of Shiva rather than exploitable resources. Drawing on Guattari’s three ecologies, their protests defend an embodied, relational sacred ecology against the state’s homogenizing, extractive logic. Far from a mere environmental dispute, this struggle reveals Hindutva’s betrayal of plural, place-based Hinduism and challenges the secular-pluralist foundations of the Indian republic.
The Sovereign Insider: A Philosophical Indictment of Corporate Immunity in India — An Open Letter to Ajay Piramal
This open letter to Mr. Ajay Piramal is a philosophical indictment of the structural immunity enjoyed by India’s most privileged corporate actors, written from the vantage point of the outsider — the figure who stands scorched at the margins while power glides in the cool interior of impunity. Drawing on Camus, Kafka, Agamben, Śūdraka, and Brecht, the letter argues that the DHFL debacle and a string of insider-trading controversies reveal not isolated breaches but a systemic architecture in which political patronage, regulatory indulgence, and judicial hesitation combine to create a sovereign exception for the well-connected. Through satire, allegory, and critical theory, the narrative exposes how legality becomes porous, accountability becomes theatrical, and “honour” becomes a performative mask concealing a chaosophic, irrationally rational logic of sanctioned violence. The letter positions Piramal not merely as an individual accused of impropriety but as a symptom of a deeper political–economic disorder in which capital transcends consequence while ordinary depositors bear the existential weight of abandonment. Ultimately, it is a citizen’s dispatch from the perimeter of power — a call to recognise how India’s corporate–political nexus manufactures insiders and outsiders with sunlit inevitability.
Piramal Pharma’s QuikKool and the Biopolitics of Relief
This essay is a hybrid inquiry into pain, pharmacology, and structural violence, using Piramal Pharma’s QuikKool oral gel as both a clinical artefact and a political metaphor. Grounded in the lived experience of the author as a DHFL victim—one of the statistically erased bodies in India’s ongoing financial governance crisis—the text follows how stress-induced oral ulcers become sites of embodied vulnerability. These wounds, though clinically minor, reveal a deeper narrative: that the body becomes an archive where systemic injustice is recorded in mucosal scar tissue, where governance is felt not only in courts and bureaucracies but also in nerves, blood vessels, and salivary chemistry. A rupture in the narrative—a pharmacological table—interrupts the personal account, echoing what D. S. Kothari identifies as the reductionist violence of modern medicine. Clinical data intrudes into lived reality, forcing suffering to format itself into measurable toxicities, biochemical pathways, and treatable symptoms. The essay draws on Foucault, Sontag, Illich, Nandy, and Kothari to frame the ulcer as a biopolitical wound, the gel as an instrument of structural anesthesia, and the body as a ledger of financial erasure. Relief appears not as a neutral good but as a technique of governance: a way of rendering pain clinically legible while erasing its political origins. By interweaving pharmacology, political economy, narrative testimony, and philosophical critique, the essay argues that modern medicine—especially in its commercial OTC form—participates in a wider regime of numbing. Piramal’s non-pharmacological OTC products, when examined alongside QuikKool, reveal how toxic capitalism operates even through substances marketed as harmless. The essay ends by proposing a radical ethical stance: that healing must be understood as a political act, and relief must be interrogated as a form of governance.
DHFL Scam and the Piramal Empire: Chaosophies of the Share Market
This analysis examines the Piramal Group’s post-DHFL restructuring across Finance, Pharma, and Realty, situating it alongside the DHFL insolvency to reveal a systemic logic of corporate immunity in India. Through demergers, reverse mergers, and strategic rebrandings, the group consolidated promoter control, quarantined legacy risks, and leveraged regulatory timing while dispersing accountability. Piramal Finance Ltd.’s premium listing, despite DHFL-linked liabilities and opaque asset valuations, exemplifies how market narratives, algorithmic momentum, and legal finality privilege investor perception over depositor justice. Piramal Pharma’s operational stress contrasts with narrative-driven valuation, highlighting structural fragility masked by forward-looking communications. The study demonstrates that restructuring has evolved into a mechanism of reputational cleansing and social erasure, wherein financial architecture advances faster than justice, and ethical accountability is systematically sidelined. Moreover, the chaosophy of the share market—its inherent unpredictability, narrative-driven volatility, and speculative feedback loops—renders conventional risk assessment almost performative, showing how perception, hype, and algorithmic herding often dictate market outcomes more than fundamentals or depositor rights.
SLAPPocalypse Now: When Corporate Fragility Meets the DPDP Act — A Sarcastic Missive to Ajay Piramal (Featuring A Case Against OBMA)
This satirical legal draft lampoons the alleged use of SLAPP suits by Ajay Piramal’s legal team, mocking their attempts to file defamation and DPDP-based complaints against the author and OBMA despite the obvious legal incoherence of such actions. Through exaggerated legal language, ironic self-deprecation, and political commentary, it portrays the Respondents as targets of authoritarian overreach while highlighting how the DPDP Act is being misapplied to suppress dissent. The document parodies courtroom procedure, inflates accusations to absurd extremes, and ultimately undercuts its own premise by noting that the DPDP Act cannot even be used for defamation—exposing the strategic misuse of lawfare against activists and critics.
The Atmanirbhar Paradox: “Boycott China” for Citizens, Shanghai Sourcing for Piramal
This letter interrogates the glaring contradiction between the BJP-led Indian government’s public calls for boycotting Chinese goods and Piramal Pharma’s own officially listed Shanghai “Sourcing Office,” highlighting how nationalist rhetoric is imposed on ordinary citizens while crony conglomerates quietly expand global supply chains. Situating Ajay Piramal within a wider system of ruling-party proximity—ranging from electoral bonds and PM-CARES contributions to corporate-state entanglements—the letter questions how the BJP’s notion of “anti-nationalism” conveniently excludes large corporations even when their actions allegedly harm Indian retirees (as in the DHFL resolution) or depend heavily on China despite territorial tensions. It argues that nationalism has become a burdensome commodity forced upon the masses while exempting favoured corporates who simultaneously benefit from state patronage and globalized profit structures. Ultimately, it challenges the moral and political legitimacy of this selective patriotism and demands transparency regarding Piramal Pharma’s China-linked operations amid government-led narratives of “Atmanirbhar Bharat.”
Once in a Blue Moon Academia 