Posted on 19th September, 2024 (GMT 11:52 hrs)
Updated on 18th February, 2025 (GMT 14:45 hrs)
ABSTRACT
The article addresses the DHFL scam victims’ frustration, urging them to take proactive measures instead of repeatedly asking when they’ll recover their funds. It highlights systemic issues, such as the influence of the ruling party, judicial delays, and the questionable role of key figures like Ajay Piramal. Victims are encouraged to pursue civil disobedience and legal action, emphasizing that pressure from organized activism could hasten justice. The court and executive failures are criticized, suggesting activism as a means to reclaim their rights.
We, the OBMA activists, share the frustration cum irritation of continuously facing the same question from certain persons over and over again, who have been genuinely afflicted by the Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Limited (DHFL) Scam: “When will we get our hard-earned life savings back?” While we fully understand their anxiety and empathize with their undeserving plight, repeatedly asking this question on various platforms without taking meaningful action will not bring about the desired result.
It disheartens us to see many victims, who, out of fear, apathy, or indifference, are quick to ask these questions but reluctant to participate in the web-based non-violent civil disobedience movement—an effort that could actually accelerate the process of recovery. Simply asking whilst sitting passive is futile in the long run.
If you patiently analyze the situation now, after 2024 Lok Sabha Election, you can easily understand the states of affairs or “what’s going on”.
In light of this, and in an effort to provide a clear and final response, we present a few key points that could help alleviate the suffering of DHFL victims through organized resistance— a stance we have been encouraging since as early as 2021.
The return of your money depends on several key factors:
1. The Ruling Party’s Will and Whimdom
- Blurring of Boundaries: The demarcating line between the executive and judiciary has become blurred, leading to potential manipulation of justice. In other words, the watertight compartmentalization of the executive and judiciary is in the process of withering away.
- Direct Involvement in Financial Malpractices: The ruling party is allegedly linked to terror funding through figures like Dawood, Mirchi, Dheeraj Realty, and DHFL.
- Electoral Bonds and Contributions: Notably, Mr. Piramal donated ₹85 crore to the ruling party through electoral bonds, while the Wadhawan brothers’ “lesser” contribution of ₹27.5 crore was tied to terror funding.
2. Strength of the Pressure Groups
- Online and On-Ground Activism: The more pressure you apply—both online and in the streets—the stronger your chances. Two recent movements highlight this very phenomenon:
- Farmers’ Movement: Over 750 farmers sacrificed their lives, pushing the government to act in repealing the draconian farmers’ laws. They did not take their struggle to the courts, but emphasized the fight for justice on the public spaces, implying how one has to frequently exploit the space(s) outside the restricted-expensive domains of the judiciary. Online toolkits further helped the farmers with their agenda.
- R.G. Kar Movement in Kolkata: This movement led to the Supreme Court taking suo moto cognizance of the issue. However, it must also be noted that due to the potential Saffronization of the SCI, it failed to take similar Suo Moto measures in the rape cases where BJP members and leaders were/are involved, e.g., Asifa, Bilkis Bano, Manipur Gender Violence, Ram Mandir Gangrape, Snoopgate scandal, as well as with regard to the allegations made against Prajwal Revanna and Brij Bhushan Singh and so on. The SCI has also failed to pay heed to the DHFL victims’ call for taking suo moto cognizance through an online mass petition in the case of financial abuse by the RBI-appointed CoC and Mr. Ajay Piramal.
3. Merits of the Case In Favour of the Victims
- Exposing the Role of RBI-Appointed CoC: The committee overseeing DHFL has been exposed for its questionable actions. The initial NCLT verdict on 19/05/2021 went against the CoC’s Resolution Plan, but the second NCLT order on 07/06/2021 favored Mr. Piramal (who is “more equal than others”). The NCLAT second verdict on 27/01/2022 highlighted that the resolution plan is full of material irregularities, illegalities and that the resolution process is void. Credit is due to 63 Moons Technologies for their sinceremost legal efforts, which exposed the CoC’s misconduct.
- Piramal’s Takeover: Mr. Piramal, as an adverse possessor, benefiting from the lowest quasi-judicial body’s second verdict and a blanket stay order from the Supreme Court on 11/04/2022, now claims “ownership” of the DHFL even when the case is still sub judice.
Additional Points:
- Court Delays: The Supreme Court continues to delay its final verdict by giving out “taarikh pe taarikh”, seemingly to protect the crony interests of Mr. Piramal, the CoC, and the ruling party’s close connections with Mukesh Ambani, who is again the secondary kin of Mr. Piramal.
- Setting a Precedent: One must not forget the RBI-appointed CoC for DHFL’s reaction to the first NCLT ruling on 19th May, 2021—“The verdict will set a bad precedent”—reflecting their attempt to shield the RP despite the adverse judgment to reconsider the erstwhile promoters’ full repayment settlement proposal. In fact, as per the RBI’s intent, the DHFL case was put under the ill-conceived Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) as a “test case,” with over 35 amendments to the code, treating FD and NCD holders as experimental subjects or mere guinea pigs in the lab-state of the RBI.
What Can You Do?
Dear Victims, there are two paths available and accessible to you at present:
- (X) Legal Action: If possible, pursue legal battles, though that may be quite costly.
- (Y) Civil Disobedience: Keep on acting as a pressure group through non-violent, web-based movements. If needed, take your burning demands to the streets in order to reclaim your distributive justice in what appears to be a rotten, sick and failed state of India.
And/or, you may also conceive a third option (Z), which can merge both options (X) and (Y) simultaneously and in parallel.
Stay strong, courageous and united in your fight for justice, reminding yourself of Swami Vivekananda’s notable pronouncement citing the Kaṭha Upaniṣad: uttiṣṭha jāgrata prāpya varānnibodhata (Arise, Awake– and do not stop until the goal is reached)!
If Ponzi Customers of scam-hit Sahara and Alchemist Group can get their money back, why not DHFL customers? Please note that DHFL is not a Ponzi scheme but a shadow bank or NBFC under the RBI.
Remember, the state-corporate agencies, who caused these unsolicited miseries and sufferings to the DHFL victims, are merely fragile “paper-tigers”!
UPDATE (18/02/2025): THE CBI CLEAN CHIT TO THE WADHAWANS
After an extensive three-year investigation, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has closed its case against Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Limited (DHFL) and its “ex” directors concerning the alleged creation of approximately 2.60 lakh fictitious home loan accounts to launder Rupees 34,000 crores. These accounts were allegedly used to claim interest subsidies under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY).
The CBI concluded that there was “insufficient evidence” to establish a criminal conspiracy leading to the creation of these accounts.
The allegations stemmed from a forensic audit by Grant Thornton, which reported that DHFL had established a fictitious branch in Bandra, Mumbai. Within this non-existent branch, fake housing loan accounts were purportedly created between 2007 and 2019, amounting to loans worth ₹14,046 crore. Of this, ₹11,755.79 crore was allegedly routed to several fictitious firms known as “Bandra Book” entities. Many of these “bogus” ghost loan accounts were reportedly linked to the PMAY to claim interest subsidies from the National Housing Bank. DHFL had processed 88,651 cases under the PMAY until December 2018, receiving an interest subsidy of ₹539.40 crore, with an additional ₹1,347.80 crore pending.
Despite these so-called “findings”, the CBI’s investigation did not uncover sufficient evidence of a criminal conspiracy. The agency has submitted its final report to a special court in Delhi, which will decide whether to accept the closure report or order further investigation into the matter.
This development marks a significant turn in one of India’s most high-profile financial investigations, highlighting the complexities involved in CONCLUSIVELY proving corporate fraud as such within the crony oligarchical setup of contemporary Indian polity.
CBI closes case against DHFL, its directors in ‘fake’ home loan accounts case VIEW HERE ⤡ (As reported on 23rd January, 2025 ©The Hindu)
After this grand exposé in the CBI Closure Report,
How will Mr. Piramal, the alleged adverse possessor, the king of (de)mergers, handle this topsy turvy situation?
SEE ALSO:
Once in a Blue Moon Academia 
LikeLike
On behalf of Once in a Blue Moon Academia (OBMA), we want to assure all DHFL victims that our 4+ years of research into this complex “scam” reinforce a crucial truth, paraphrasing Rosa Luxemburg: “those who do not move do not notice their chains”. Our efforts to mobilize dissenting voices among the financially abused DHFL FD and NCD holders have shown that the future outcome of this case hinges on our collective will to pressure the indifferent authorities responsible for this misery.
This pressure will determine how compelled they are to act in our favor, given that we have the NCLT’s first verdict (19.05.2021), the NCLAT’s second verdict (27.01.2022), and the Constitution of India supporting us. Patience and resilience are crucial as we continue this fight, backed by international human rights. We must not allow the crony capitalist regime empowered by the BJP to prevail.
Currently, the DHFL “scam” is showing signs of a positive shift, particularly after the CBI’s 2025 closure report gave a clean chit to the Wadhawan brothers. While this does not absolve them of any and every corporate wrongdoing, it presents an opportunity to pressure them into repaying the full principal amount with interest to all small creditors, considering the prestige once held by their AAA-rated NBFC.
Therefore, we must continue to fight and resist without hesitation. This is OBMA’s stance on the matter of concern.
LikeLike