Absolute Cultural Reterritorialization Of Imagi-native Geo-Political Boundaries Instead Of Deterritorialization: The (Il)legitimacy Of Article 371 (A-J) After Scrapping Article 370 Of The Indian Constitution

Akhar Bandyopadhyay ⤡

Debaprasad Bandyopadhyay ⤡

Posted on 20th April, 2021

Updated on 6th December, 2021

Abstract

The article advocates for the abrogation of Article 371 (A-J) of the Indian Constitution, following the 2019 revocation of Article 370, to advance Hindutva-driven cultural nationalism. Framed as an appeal to India’s President, it argues that Article 371’s special provisions for states like Nagaland and Mizoram perpetuate regional diversity, undermining the vision of a mono-religious, mono-cultural Hindu rashtra. Drawing on Wittgenstein, Anderson, Said, and Foucault, and employing a deconstructive methodology, the authors critique the “Western” constitutional framework for fostering territorial nationalism over cultural homogeneity. They propose absolute cultural reterritorialization to erase imagined geo-political boundaries, subsuming diverse regions into a unified Hindu nation-state. The article questions the legitimacy of Article 371, claiming it obstructs Hindutva’s exclusivist ideology, and calls for a singular national identity rooted in Aryan cultural heritage, dismissing Nehruvian pluralism as antithetical to this goal

This letter-paper questions the legitimacy of Article 371 of Indian Constitution after the revoking of Article 370 by the Bharatiya Janata Party (5 August 2019). The paper traces the history of all the Indian federal States, which are listed in Article 371 with a special emphasis on Jammu and Kashmir.

See also:

“Identity Confusion” VIEW HERE ⤡

Language: From I-Dentity to My-Dentity VIEW HERE ⤡

IF ARTICLE 370 IS REVOKED, WHY NOT ARTICLE 371 OF THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION? VIEW HERE ⤡ @academia.edu

IF ARTICLE 370 IS REVOKED, WHY NOT ARTICLE 371 OF THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION? VIEW HERE ⤡ @researchgate

Akhar Bandyopadhyay's avatarAkhar Bandyopadhyay

To

The HonourablePresident,

The Republic ofIndia,

Rashtrapati Bhavan,

New Delhi-110004

Sub: An appeal for scrapping the Article 371 (A-J) in defence of cultural nationalism: Save Hindutva

Respected Ācārya,

First of all, we must thank you all for scrapping the Article 370 of the Indian Constitution. For the sake of Uniform Civil and Political Code, there should not be any positive or negative discriminatory rules and regulations within the ambit of International Law and jurisprudence.

The subject-matter of the present letter concerns the West-mimicking and hybrid “Constitution” of India, or rather, two specific Articles in it: Article 370 and Article 371 (A-J). As evident from our previous letters addressed to you, we are staunch and sturdy advocates of the Hindutva cultural nationalism as propagated by venerable Guruji M.S. Golwalkar, set against the utterly fake Nehruvian ideal of democratic, territorial nationalism, which implies “…a certain tolerance of others…

View original post 5,160 more words

20 Comments

  1. Kindly note that Amnesty International’s statement on OHCHR’s report cannot be opened from India! It is banned! Why?

    https://amnesty.org.in/news-update/statement-on-un-ohchr-report/

    Liked by 5 people

  2. “The Chief Of Army Staff General Bipin Rawat has awarded Major Leetul Gogoi, the officer who placed a Kashmiri man on the bonnet of his jeep during recent protests in Kashmir, with a Chief of Army Staff Commendation Card. Sources in the army said, “Major Gogoi has been awarded COAS Commendation Card for sustained efforts in Counter-insurgency operations”. These operations, they added, include the actions of the Major on April 9 during the Srinagar by-election, when a local — later identified as Farooq Ahmad Dar — was tied to the bonnet of an Army vehicle in Kashmir’s Budgam.”

    Liked by 5 people

  3. Akhar Bandyopadhyay's avatar Akhar Bandyopadhyay says:

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a reply to Once In A Blue Moon Academia Cancel reply