This article interrogates the structural contradictions and opaque operational logic of Change.org, a platform widely regarded as a grassroots petition engine for justice. Drawing on the author’s lived experience with unexplained signature count reductions and suspected content suppression, it situates Change.org within the broader economy of digital activism where public outrage is algorithmically packaged for visibility and monetization. Despite popular assumptions of its progressive orientation, this paper argues that the platform’s apparent ideological tilt is symptomatic not of political commitment but of profit-maximizing emotional amplification. Furthermore, the piece contextualizes these concerns within a case study of the OBMA campaign for DHFL victims, where legal intimidation and social media censorship—allegedly linked to corporate interests—highlight the fragility of digital dissent. The article challenges both the ethical legitimacy and the epistemic reliability of Change.org as a site of justice-oriented mobilization.
Category Archives: Activities
Our current activities concentrate on the case of Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Limited (DHFL), India. While exploring and investigating this particular case, we have found that India’s crony ruling party, gangsters, banksters as well as religious gurus and institutions are involved in the same. Therefore, to break such collusion, we have decided to deploy an “all out attack” on the existing paradigm of neoliberal market economy as well as market fundamentalism. ***DISCLAIMER: We have collected all the data from available sources on the internet as given on the official portals of media houses, websites and institutions and organizations. We are not first-hand reporters and hence, we are not liable for any inadvertent error or value-loaded statements made on those portals. All propositions have to be viewed as descriptive assertions on the given point of concern.***
MEMO SUBMITTED: Demand for a Judicial Truth Commission on the DHFL Verdict
This article announces the submission of a people’s memorandum to India’s highest constitutional and judicial offices, demanding a Judicial Truth and Accountability Commission to probe the DHFL Supreme Court verdict—a decision that legitimized the corporate expropriation of thousands of depositors’ life savings. The memo exposes judicial silence, regulatory complicity, and the erasure of dissent. Backed by a rapidly growing online mass petition, this is a collective cry for justice, transparency, and the restoration of democratic integrity in the face of systemic betrayal.
Justice for DHFL Victims: Demand a Judicial Truth Commission Now! (An Online Mass Petition)
The article calls for a Judicial Truth and Accountability Commission to investigate the DHFL insolvency verdict, which allegedly enabled corporate expropriation of small investors’ savings. It poses questions to the Supreme Court for upholding a reportedly flawed resolution plan, questions regulators, the CoC, and corporate actors like Ajay Piramal of collusion, and highlights systemic failures, including cronyism, auditor lapses, and possible political links. Framing the crisis as a human rights issue involving financial abuse, the petition seeks justice, reparations, and institutional accountability.
Justice via Intimidation? A Financially Abused Citizen vs. the Corporate-State Nexus
The author of this open communication to the Hon’ble Bombay High is a victim of the DHFL financial scandal. He reports receiving a Bombay High Court suit (No. 42 of March 17, 2025) unusually via the Mumbai Sheriff, which contained identity errors, redundant or blank pages, and a mere five‑day response window, compared to the 90 days apparently allotted to corporate plaintiff Mr. Ajay Piramal. He argues that this situation appears to constitute legal intimidation by a powerful corporate‑state nexus that has left him impoverished and unable to secure counsel within such a short temporal window. He highlights his right to self‑representation and demands clarity on the apparently vague allegations, framing the situation as Kafkaesque. Additionally, he draws attention to alleged corporate malfeasance linked to Ajay Piramal—insider‑trading fines, environmental violations, political donations, and controversial acquisitions such as DHFL, along with real‑estate deals—and contends that the political executives enforce the law selectively, favoring elites and infringing upon constitutional rights and international human rights norms. This open communication is intended to defend the fundamental freedom of speech and expression, which constitutes an exception to defamation as guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution.
Mr. Ajay Piramal: A Snapshot of ALLEGED Controversies
The article presents a brief portrayal of Ajay Piramal, juxtaposing his typically lauded “philanthropic” (CSR) efforts through the Piramal Foundation’s initiatives with a myriad of serious allegations suggesting misuse of influence and finances. Critics sometimes assert/allege that he orchestrated a questionable purchase of DHFL through a dubious IBC resolution process, which has led to potential court contempt issues. SEBI investigations into insider trading (2016, 2019) and irregularities in stake sales (2024) are also present with regard to Mr. Piramal’s business career. He is also reportedly connected to the Flashnet scandal and alleged environmental damage in Digwal, Telangana, where he purportedly sought and lost a stay order at the National Green Tribunal. Additional controversy arises from ₹85 crore in BJP donations through electoral bonds, purportedly exploitative real estate clauses, and a loan to Omkar Developers that prompted ED scrutiny—yet Mr. Piramal is said to have obtained legal protection. The narrative suggests that his political connections, particularly with the BJP, may have enabled him to repeatedly evade regulatory accountability, casting doubt on whether his philanthropic initiatives are intended to deflect criticism from these alleged financial improprieties. The article does not intend to defame or target the individual Ajay Piramal; rather, it seeks to highlight the potential implications of a corporate tycoon operating within a BJP-led crony framework in contemporary India.
DHFL Victims Under Legal Siege by Crony Piramal: What’s Next?
India’s low ranking in the 2024 Rule of Law Index (79th out of 142) highlights systemic issues that frame the legal conflict between OBMA activists and Mr. Piramal’s firm, DSK Legal. Despite OBMA’s careful and transparent communication, legal threats like defamation suits and contempt notices appear aimed at silencing dissent and protecting corporate impunity. With Article 19 protecting free speech and Section 66A of the IT Act already struck down, such actions lack constitutional footing. The burden lies on the plaintiff to prove malice—something OBMA’s peaceful and public-facing activism clearly defies. This case signals a broader fight for democratic accountability in an increasingly corporatized legal system.
The Suicidal Futility of War: A Mourning for Civilization and a Call for Disarmament
The article “The Suicidal Futility of War: A Mourning for Civilization and a Call for Disarmament” explores the devastating consequences of warfare on humanity, civilization, and the planet, arguing that war represents a self-destructive cycle that undermines progress and moral integrity. Drawing on historical and contemporary examples, the piece examines the immense human cost, environmental destruction, and societal regression caused by armed conflicts. It critiques the perpetuation of war through political, economic, and cultural mechanisms, highlighting the futility of seeking lasting solutions through violence. The author advocates for global disarmament as a moral and practical necessity, emphasizing the need for collective action, diplomacy, and non-violent conflict resolution to safeguard civilization. By mourning the losses inflicted by war, the article issues an urgent call for humanity to reimagine a peaceful future grounded in cooperation and mutual understanding.
A Cry for Justice: The DHFL FD and NCD Holders’ Battle Against Political and Corporate Nexus
This letter addresses the plight of Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Limited (DHFL) Fixed Deposit (FD) and Non-Convertible Debenture (NCD) holders, whose hard-earned savings remain ensnared in a financial scandal marked by alleged corporate malfeasance and political collusion. It explores the contentious acquisition of DHFL by Ajay Piramal, a businessman purportedly favored by the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), spotlighting his predictive claims, ties to the Flashnet Scam, and substantial electoral bond contributions totaling ₹48 crores. The narrative critiques the judiciary’s role, highlighting a perceived erosion of independence through expedited rulings, political influence, and symbolic breaches like the Prime Minister’s visit to the Chief Justice’s residence for Ganesh Chaturthi, alongside judicial deference in cases like the Ram Mandir and Central Vista projects. Drawing on media reports, X posts, and critical analyses, it argues that a nexus of crony capitalism and political patronage obstructs justice for DHFL victims. The letter concludes with a fervent call to action, urging collective advocacy, legal recourse, and public awareness to challenge systemic inequities and restore the rightful dues of FD and NCD holders.
Godi Media and the Erosion of Indian Democracy: Crony-Sponsored Yellow Journalism?
This article examines the phenomenon of “Godi media” in India, characterized by media outlets aligning with the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), and its implications for press freedom and democratic integrity. Focusing on the controversial appointment of Sudhir Chaudhary to Doordarshan for a ₹15-18 crore annual package and his airing of a fake video in May 2025, the analysis explores how state-sponsored journalism, economic pressures, and misinformation undermine the press as the fourth pillar of democracy. Drawing on the 2025 World Press Freedom Index, fact-checking by Alt News, and social media discourse, it evaluates whether “Godi media” manufactures consent in a Goebbelsian manner and if India exhibits Orwellian traits. While democratic institutions and independent voices provide resilience, the article highlights the urgent need for reforms to restore media independence and protect public trust.
From Hungry “Thieves” (?) to Quora’s Ban: Victims Fight Crony Capitalism
The article critiques the systemic exploitation of small investors in India through the DHFL scam, alleging that Ajay Piramal acquired DHFL at a major undervaluation via a flawed IBC process that favoured corporate interests over the rights of vulnerable small investors. It accuses political and financial elite, including the BJP and RBI, of enabling this injustice. The piece especially brings to light the recent event of censorship of certain DHFL victims’ voices on Quora, where certain OBMA members were suspended for criticizing the RBI-appointed CoC-led resolution process. Framing the issue as a case of crony capitalism and “financial genocide” (finacide), it calls for justice and accountability.
Once in a Blue Moon Academia 