DHFL Victims, Know Your Judge: Hon. Justice Bela M. Trivedi

The OBMA article provides an overview of Justice Bela M. Trivedi, currently presiding over the DHFL case in India’s Supreme Court. It highlights her judicial background, significant rulings, and perceived alignment with the ruling government, sparking concerns over her impartiality. The article details past controversial case assignments and suggests a pattern of favoring government interests, raising doubts about her stance on justice for DHFL victims amid allegations of corporate and political influence.

Human Rights in India and the DHFL Scam: Knowing through Negations

The article highlights the DHFL scam as a case study in India’s human rights landscape, focusing on the misuse of state mechanisms to silence victims and activists. By examining patterns of harassment, it reveals a troubling trend where dissent against financial misconduct meets state repression. The author argues that this tactic of “knowing through negations” helps illuminate power structures at work in stifling justice. Overall, it’s a critique of how human rights violations often intersect with financial scandals in India.

Do You Want Speedy Justice in Indian Judiciary? Ufff!

The article criticizes delays and inequalities in India’s judicial system, highlighting case backlogs, vacant judicial positions, and alleged biases favoring influential figures. Examples include stalled justice for financial fraud victims and the “culture of adjournments” that worsens case backlogs, with some dating back decades. There are allegations of political interference, judicial corruption, and manipulation in high-profile cases. The article calls for accountability, infrastructure improvements, and a reform of judicial appointments to restore public trust.

CJI Chandrachud: A “Legacy” Mired in Ambivalence(s)

The article critically assesses Chief Justice Chandrachud’s legacy, emphasizing its contradictions. While he is praised for apparently being “progressive”, his tenure is also marred by decisions that seem to align with the present ruling party of India, the BJP. It discusses his ambivalence in upholding the secular constitutional values versus religion-oriented actions that favor the crony oligarchical as well as religious extremist establishment. The piece highlights his complex role in balancing judicial independence with executive influence, casting doubt on the long-term impact of his legacy.

Making the Case for DHFL Victims: A Living Instance of Crony Capitalism

The PowerPoint titled “Making the Case for DHFL Victims” by Once in a Blue Moon Academia (OBMA) presents a compelling analysis of the DHFL scam and its impact on victims. It critically examines the role of Ajay Piramal, highlighting his controversies such as insider trading, environmental violations, and alleged political connections with the ruling BJP. The presentation argues that the victims of the DHFL resolution were treated as “guinea pigs” under India’s ill-conceived Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, with the courts providing only partial support. Ultimately, it emphasizes that true justice for DHFL victims will depend on political will​ and mass mobilization.

RTI on RTIs: After the Autopsy…

The post discusses a Right to Information (RTI) application submitted to the Supreme Court of India regarding the accountability of various institutions like the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board (IBBI) in the Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Limited (DHFL) case. It highlights the lack of transparency in RTI responses and issues with governmental portals, raising concerns about possible intentional obstructions and secrecy by the ruling party. The post also reflects on India’s political economy under increasing opacity.

The Curious “Dangal” of Vinesh Phogat, Nita Ambani and Jay Shah

The article critiques the contemporary influence of Nita Ambani and Jay Shah in Indian sports, highlighting Vinesh Phogat’s unjustified Olympic disqualification and accusing Ambani and Shah of benefiting from nepotism in their respective sports roles. It argues that Ambani and Shah’s powerful positions are unjustified, questioning their qualifications and linking their influence to political patronage from the ruling BJP. The piece also reflects on larger issues of crony capitalism and the state’s protection of oligarchs, framing Phogat’s struggle as part of a broader fight against corruption.

Defending Piramal: Ethical Integrity in Peril? A Call for Clarification to Dr. A. M. Singhvi

The article criticizes Dr. A. M. Singhvi for defending Ajay Piramal, a BJP-allied businessman linked to the DHFL scam, despite Singhvi’s public opposition to the BJP. The piece highlights ethical concerns, accusing Singhvi of compromising his principles for financial gain by defending Piramal, who is involved in insider trading and crony practices. The post urges DHFL victims to engage in civil disobedience on social media, targeting Singhvi and others for their roles in advocating for those who perpetuated the DHFL scandal.

Tirupati Ka Laddoo Jo Khaya Woh Pachtaya, Jo Na Khaya Woh Bhi Pachtaya!

Posted on 1st October, 2024 (GMT 20:30 hrs) CARTOON COURTESY: SATISH ACHARYA ABSTRACT The article critiques political and religious hypocrisy in India, focusing on the controversy surrounding the sacred Tirupati laddoos. Allegations arose that these laddoos contained animal fats, triggering a political debate between the YSR Congress Party and opposition leader Chandrababu Naidu. The SupremeContinue reading “Tirupati Ka Laddoo Jo Khaya Woh Pachtaya, Jo Na Khaya Woh Bhi Pachtaya!”

Nirmala Sitharaman: ‘FIR’-‘ED’!?

The article discusses an FIR against Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, filed by Adarsh Iyer from the Janaadhikaara Sangharsha Parishath. It accuses Sitharaman and other BJP leaders of extorting corporate entities into purchasing electoral bonds by threatening Enforcement Directorate (ED) raids. The BJP allegedly collected ₹8,000 crores in this manner. While a Bengaluru court ordered a probe into these claims, the Karnataka High Court later stayed the investigation, citing insufficient evidence of extortion. The High Court has paused the case until October 22, 2024. This post also brings out the unconstitutional and crony electoral bonds scheme, the failing state of the Indian judiciary, and the naked collusion amidst the BJP and key corporate figures.