India’s low ranking in the 2024 Rule of Law Index (79th out of 142) highlights systemic issues that frame the legal conflict between OBMA activists and Mr. Piramal’s firm, DSK Legal. Despite OBMA’s careful and transparent communication, legal threats like defamation suits and contempt notices appear aimed at silencing dissent and protecting corporate impunity. With Article 19 protecting free speech and Section 66A of the IT Act already struck down, such actions lack constitutional footing. The burden lies on the plaintiff to prove malice—something OBMA’s peaceful and public-facing activism clearly defies. This case signals a broader fight for democratic accountability in an increasingly corporatized legal system.